Romain Grosjean gave further indication of Lotus’s pace by setting the fastest time on the final day of testing at Mugello.
Grosjean’s lap of 1’21.035 put him almost a quarter of a second ahead of Sebastian Vettel.
Kimi Raikkonen was originally scheduled to drive the final day for Lotus but following the rain on Tuesday Lotus decided to run Grosjean for the remaining two days. Trackside operations director Alan Permane said it would allow them to “make better use of the time” they had left.
Fernando Alonso was third-fastest in the Ferrari, which sported a revised exhaust arrangement.
But Alonso lost around two hours in the morning after spinning off and hitting the barrier, damaging the front of the car. He had set the fastest time so far shortly before his crash.
The red flag came out twice more during the day’s running. Paul di Resta stopped during the morning, having been given extra time in the car following the team’s problems yesterday.
After the lunch break Heikki Kovalainen brought the red flags out again when he went off at the first corner.
Pastor Maldonado spent most of the time doing aerodynamic tests for Williams before moving up to seventh in the afternoon. Late improvements from Nico Rosberg and Oliver Turvey lifted them into eighth and ninth.
Driver | Car | Best time | Laps | Difference | |
1 | Romain Grosjean | Lotus-Renault E20 | 1’21.035 | 66 | |
2 | Sebastian Vettel | Red Bull-Renault RB8 | 1’21.267 | 106 | 0.232 |
3 | Fernando Alonso | Ferrari F2012 | 1’21.363 | 98 | 0.328 |
4 | Daniel Ricciardo | Toro Rosso-Ferrari STR7 | 1’21.604 | 117 | 0.569 |
5 | Sergio Perez | Sauber-Ferrari C31 | 1’22.229 | 118 | 1.194 |
6 | Nico Hulkenberg | Force India-Mercedes VJM05 | 1’22.325 | 55 | 1.290 |
7 | Pastor Maldonado | Williams-Renault FW34 | 1’22.497 | 63 | 1.462 |
8 | Nico Rosberg | Mercedes W03 | 1’22.579 | 129 | 1.544 |
9 | Oliver Turvey | McLaren-Mercedes MP4-27 | 1’22.662 | 99 | 1.627 |
10 | Paul di Resta | Force India-Mercedes VJM05 | 1’23.002 | 34 | 1.967 |
11 | Heikki Kovalainen | Caterham-Renault CT01 | 1’23.169 | 139 | 2.134 |
12 | Timo Glock | Marussia-Cosworth MR01 | 1’23.466 | 110 | 2.431 |
Mugello test combined times
Driver | Team | Time | Gap | |
1 | Romain Grosjean | Lotus | 1’21.035 | 0.000 |
2 | Sebastian Vettel | Red Bull | 1’21.267 | 0.232 |
3 | Fernando Alonso | Ferrari | 1’21.363 | 0.328 |
4 | Kamui Kobayashi | Sauber | 1’21.603 | 0.568 |
5 | Daniel Ricciardo | Toro Rosso | 1’21.604 | 0.569 |
6 | Mark Webber | Red Bull | 1’21.997 | 0.962 |
7 | Sergio Perez | Sauber | 1’22.229 | 1.194 |
8 | Felipe Massa | Ferrari | 1’22.257 | 1.222 |
9 | Nico Hulkenberg | Force India | 1’22.325 | 1.290 |
10 | Jean-Eric Vergne | Toro Rosso | 1’22.422 | 1.387 |
11 | Pastor Maldonado | Williams | 1’22.497 | 1.462 |
12 | Nico Rosberg | Mercedes | 1’22.579 | 1.544 |
13 | Oliver Turvey | McLaren | 1’22.662 | 1.627 |
14 | Paul di Resta | Force India | 1’23.002 | 1.967 |
15 | Heikki Kovalainen | Caterham | 1’23.169 | 2.134 |
16 | Michael Schumacher | Mercedes | 1’23.404 | 2.369 |
17 | Timo Glock | Marussia | 1’23.466 | 2.431 |
18 | Charles Pic | Marussia | 1’23.982 | 2.947 |
19 | Jerome D’Ambrosio | Lotus | 1’24.048 | 3.013 |
20 | Vitaly Petrov | Caterham | 1’24.312 | 3.277 |
21 | Gary Paffett | McLaren | 1’24.480 | 3.445 |
22 | Bruno Senna | Williams | 1’24.842 | 3.807 |
23 | Jules Bianchi | Force India | 1’25.475 | 4.440 |
24 | Rodolfo Gonzalez | Caterham | 1’27.197 | 6.162 |
25 | Valtteri Bottas | Williams | 1’29.179 | 8.144 |
2012 F1 season
- Hulkenberg’s missed win should have been “high point” for Force India
- Kubica reveals he almost withdrew from fateful 2011 rally – and had 2012 Ferrari F1 deal
- 2012 F1 season Blu-Ray “Victorious Vettel” reviewed
- 2012 F1 season DVD “Victorious Vettel” reviewed
- New team radio reveals Vettel’s penalty protests
Browse all 2012 F1 season articles
Image ?é?® Lotus F1 Team/LAT
BasCB (@bascb)
3rd May 2012, 17:11
Looks like after the first day everyone now got a healthy amount of laps in. I hope it help keep the field close together!
MJ (@mjf1)
3rd May 2012, 17:25
Quick question: do teams have to use the same engines allocated for the races for these in-season tests or can they use brand new engines which don’t count as part of the race engines allocated for the season?
Todfod (@todfod)
3rd May 2012, 18:25
They have separate engines and gearboxes for testing. No limit of what you use during tests
raymondu999 (@raymondu999)
4th May 2012, 6:17
@Todfod Testing is limited – just that it comes from a different pool to the engines you use for the season. Limited to 2 gearboxes and 4 engines for if I remember correctly.
Max Jacobson (@vettel1)
3rd May 2012, 17:42
Lotus look very quick indeed, as do Red Bull. I think probably the only reason that the Ferrari is where it is is due to them doing a qualifying simulation; I’m not expecting them to be particularly competitive when it comes to Spain. Mclaren do look a bit like they haven’t gained much pace relative to the others, which is unlike them, normally they are very good in the development race.
Snafu (@snafu)
3rd May 2012, 17:52
Mclaren is going to bring their aero package in Spain…they were just evaluating their simulation with real car in this test, so they can get better feeling of new parts when they test them in simulator. I say that’s a very clever thinking from them.
Max Jacobson (@vettel1)
4th May 2012, 9:27
@snafu – I wasn’t aware of that, so thank you. I thought there fundamental lack of pace was either due to the fact they were using their test drivers or due to the type of simulation work they were doing. So were they just running the early race spec car? In treating that they wouldn’t trial the aero package on the last day at least..
Snafu (@snafu)
4th May 2012, 11:21
I think it was Bahrain’s spec car
most of their preparations for a new package is done in simulator prior to race weekend. and they always had enough time to test it on track in FP1 and FP2 when there was no in-season testing allowed…so maybe they feel confident about the direction they took for their development and used Mugello as a free time on track.
what I’m trying to say is that these times are all unofficial and shouldn’t be taken very seriously.
JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1)
3rd May 2012, 17:55
Maybe, due to using their test drivers, they’re trying to improve further the correlation between the simulator and track, so that they can better develop their car throughout this and other seasons?
Mere speculation of course, but definitely food for thought.
Brian @clustr1
3rd May 2012, 18:19
I think the Ferrari performance could be better than you think. Their new exhaust is clearly now inline with the other top runners this year, taking advantage of the down-wash to blow over the diffuser. Their previous design was way off the mark and revising it required a ton of development (I think they would have had to pass another crash test). Only time will tell, but I really like the way it looks!
raymondu999 (@raymondu999)
4th May 2012, 6:19
@clustr1 that exhaust blows nowhere near the diffuser to be honest. It might do in the future. The modular design of their exhaust bit means they could switch to a McLaren/Williams/Findia/Sauber/STR style solution very quickly, but this particular design doesn’t blow to the diffuser at all.
Max Jacobson (@vettel1)
4th May 2012, 13:44
@clustr1 – It may be an improvement, but a second improvement? I doubt that, they may be able to improve by around 6/7ths at best, which would keep Alonso in the running the way he’s been driving recently. Don’t get me wrong I’d love to see Ferrari being competitive, but I just don’t see it happening this year.
raymondu999 (@raymondu999)
4th May 2012, 6:22
I still don’t think McLaren is any special in terms of development. They’ve been flattered with a rubbish car in 2009 and a car that peaked early in 2010, and mistakes in early 2011.
2009 – The car was fundamentally a good, competitive car. It should be a frontrunner, had it not been for a lack of outwash endplates and the weight distribution issue.
2010 – Development was good until Silverstone. Then it flatlined.
2011 – The car was always competitive since the start, and really it was a question of them getting better life and more out of the tyres than Red Bull.
OOliver
3rd May 2012, 18:08
This may just be a test with each team running different programmes, but it doesn’t escape ones attention, the ease with which the Lotus can set fastest times. I think they have the fastest car in terms of consistent handling. They have just not extracted the maximum from it.
The tenth or 2 they lose out in terms of outright one lap speed, they make up for with the ability to maintain a higher aveage speed across a series of laps.
Raikkonen and Grosjean are serious contenders for the driver’s championship.
Dejan Milosavljevic (@kimster381)
3rd May 2012, 19:01
@OOliver I think you’re completely right,not only is the Lotus Renault a fundamentally fast car,but it seems that there is even more potential in it,waiting to be extracted.Your astute observation about the handling of the car is spot on,not only is it one of the fastest cars out there,but it seems to be very easy to drive,which in effect makes it easy to put in consistently fast laps over a long run.And as the season progresses and booth drivers get really settled in,the row pace of this car will show even more.
Julian (@julian)
3rd May 2012, 20:45
Unless they do what they did last year and fall behind as the other teams update their cars.
But considering how they don’t have that front exhaust hampering them this year, they should be able to keep up.
AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner)
4th May 2012, 13:41
@julian Yeah, I think it took them a while to admit that as nice as that idea was, it wasn;t working for them.
nickfrog (@nickfrog)
3rd May 2012, 21:29
Yep, hopefully Lotus can be in contention although, as highlighted, I am concerned that their more limited resources might hinder them when it comes to keep up with the big spenders in the coming months…
Kimi4WC
4th May 2012, 7:53
As long as they get podiums, Unilever will write the checks bigger than Red Bull or Mercedes are getting.
AJ (@aj13)
3rd May 2012, 20:39
At risk of banging a drum. The reason we go to boring tracks outside of F1s core European Audience Is for £££££.
However if F1 controlled its own commercial rights instead of giving Bernie and his CVC cohorts $500-750m a year, they could afford to drop the Arab money for desert racing on zzzzzz tracks and race predominantly in front of their core audience in Europe.
Don’t see the NFL playing in UAE, Korea et al. . .
nickfrog (@nickfrog)
3rd May 2012, 21:27
Couldn’t agree more with that comment. If it was a Sport at all, then there would be a race in Portimao too…
OOliver
3rd May 2012, 21:51
In the same vain, we could just have England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland play in a football tournament and call it the world cup.
In the not too distant future, I can very well see some politician seeking to ban motor racing or limit it to 40mph.
Europe is shrinking, manufacturing capacity and the service industry can’t sustain F1 hence the need to expand out of Europe.
If you exclude a lot of the none European races, TV income will soon drop as they begin to lose interest. It won’t take too long before the drivers are having to sew their own overalls.
infy (@infy)
3rd May 2012, 22:08
I’m sorry but Europe’s races are pretty average at best.
gwenouille (@gwenouille)
3rd May 2012, 22:31
Spa ?
Monaco ?
Silverstone ?
Monza ?
Even Budapest ?
timi (@timi)
3rd May 2012, 23:40
Monaco’s track is great. For viewing, pretty boring if you ask me.
AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner)
4th May 2012, 13:46
@aj13 They can’t afford to drop anything. They’re massively in debt. Like any company, they have bills to pay. Let’s not pretend that this isn’t a business that benefits everyone in the sport. If they started ditching the more lucrative races the teams would complain that they’re not getting enough of a pay out from FOM to remain competitive with other forms of motorsport.
Julian (@julian)
3rd May 2012, 20:54
From what I’ve read about the testing, Ferrari seem to have tested 2 new exhaust configs, new rear wing, new brake ducts, new floor, new engine cover, new turning vanes and a new beam wing.
And Ferrari are saying they have have a lot more to come at Barcelona.
It seems like the updates have improved their pace a bit, but as always, we wont know for sure until qualifying in Barcelona.
infy (@infy)
3rd May 2012, 22:09
I wouldn’t expect too much.
raymondu999 (@raymondu999)
4th May 2012, 6:23
@julian Ferrari said they’ve put up 90% of their new package here, with the remaining 10% in Barcelona.
Ian (@valkyrassassin)
4th May 2012, 21:19
I expect Ferrari to at least be solidly in the top 10 in Spain, they shouldn’t be quite as bad. Alonso always goes well at his home track, so top 5 in qualifying at least is possible.
Rian
4th May 2012, 0:09
Lotus look very quick and Red Bull too.
AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner)
4th May 2012, 13:46
Well they looked good in Bahrain so I expect they will be very, very competitive in Spain.
Faba
4th May 2012, 22:20
The Ferrari looks very good. He did the fastest of his laps in a 9 lap run and at the very beginning of the session when there was not much rubber, temperature like vettel and grosjean enjoyed when they did their fastest laps. I just read that the car in kugel lo only had a few upgrades, but that a new front nose, rear wing, new engine cover with a s-duct Mercedes style and a new floor among other things will be put in Spain. So a second of improvement is quite possible since it is basically a brand new car.
jpjp
5th May 2012, 14:16
Yeah i tottaly agre..We all saw testing that alonso was on “fire” at the begining,he set 3rd time of the total testing days on HARD tyres and he was going even more faster in the lap he went off…So HARD-tyred ferrari was 1:21:3 and MEDIUM-tyred lotus was 1:21:05…I expect ferrari will be in competition with lotus for P1 at Spain..
Shiro
6th May 2012, 23:23
Lotus made fastest lap on 6 lap long run with hard tyres.